Tuesday 23 October 2012

Lance Armstrong, Loser, Cheat, Bully


It seems that everyday there is a new Lance Armstrong story in the press. The longer it goes on the more shocking it gets. Today's news is that Armstrong has been stripped of his seven Tour de France wins as well as being dropped by many sponsors. 

Let me first say that it should not be forgotten that he has twice recovered from cancer and that he has done so much for charity. 

I am dumbfounded at some of the allegations which have come out. A very professional and organised doping group led by Armstrong seems to have some truth behind it. 

This is purely down to the number of the different people coming out against Lance Armstrong collaborating the same stories. He had never been found guilty of failing any drug test in the past, but the allegations levelled at him explain exactly how he got around this. The first time I thought that something fishy was happening was when Armstrong decided not to defend a ban and the stripping of some titles against him. This is something that I believe could be an admission of guilt. If I knew I was innocent of something then I would fight till my name was cleared. Maybe the real reason he decided not to fight the ban was to stop other information coming out. 

The sport seems to have been filled with many people taking drugs to enhance their performance. The fact that he had been taking drugs seems to something that all the riders were doing. Where Armstrong seems to be worse than the rest is the fact that he was the ring leader, he would organise it all and he was more cunning in covering up the truth. To me it seemed that the other riders were almost scarred to speak out against doping and Armstrong. 

I heard Christophe Bassons a French rider talk on a brilliant BBC radio show on doping last week about how Armstrong had hounded him out the sport. The only reason being that he wrote an article saying that doping in riding still happened. He describes here how the day after the article was published, that all the other riders had planned to go slow and not tell Bassons. This meant that Bassons pushed hard from the start, then Armstrong pulled up to him and verbally abused him saying he will make his life hell. 

Another interview in that show was with an American rider who was about to come clean about doping in cycling. He claims that Armstrong found out about this and came to the restaurant where his family were dinning, stating that Armstrong threatened him.  

Lance Armstrong has friends in high places, claiming amongst his friends the last three presidents of the USA as well as some other world leaders such as French presidents. Could it be possible that to help in his cover up he was also friends with people in high places in cycling who helped cover up his misdemeanour's to save the sports reputation?  

Me being a fan of sport wants Armstrong to get everything he deserves, he has conned people into idolising him. He has bullied his way to the top of the sport and ruined the reputation of the sports once again. He has profited a lot of money through this cheating and should be accountable. 

The two worst things to come of this is that the seven titles which Armstrong cheated his way to victory now have no winners, just a little x written where the winners name should be. Something so traditional as the Tour de France will have seven failed tours. Also the fact that cycling in the UK had been on a high after the heroics of Bradley Wiggins and co through the summer, these people now are having to answer questions about why they are clean. The once legend of cycling now has pretty much been wiped out from cycling history and I believe should be forgotten, as he doesn't even deserve any mentions any more. 

Sunday 14 October 2012

The benefits of Balotelli vs The bad Balotelli


Sitting on Henman Hill/Murray Mount watching Nadal lose on the 28 June I checked my phone just for an update on the Italy v Germany semi final. To my shock I realised that Germany were loosing, and that Super Mario had scored both the goals. In my mind I thought that this could be the moment that Balotelli had craved for all his life, a point where he realised he could kick on without his issues. I probably was wrong to think this.

Just a few months before I had been watching him against Arsenal in a 1-0 loss for City, here he was sent off for a few bad tackles. Following this match it seemed Man City had blown their chance of winning the league and it was down to Balotelli being stupid. Mancini had stated that he was done with him and that he would definitely not play for the last six games of the season. 

Roberto Mancini seems to have an all most fatherly bond with Balotelli, this being that some times he is upset with him but always takes him back. Many people may call him stupid for constantly protecting a disruptive player, especially added to the fact the Mourinho could not control him. I have to give Mancini a bit of credit here, I think he has actually done a good job with him. This being that some people are uncontrollable, and Balotelli definitely fits this description.  

It seems to me an outsider that Balotelli is a big kid, the kid who never was popular. Mancini is the father, the only person who could have a slight affect on him. The fact that his parents pretty much left him to go live with other people and him suffering many illnesses as a child means that his childhood must have been very sad. This could be a reason why he is now acting out being a spoilt brat, chucking money everywhere and causing headlines for the wrong reasons. 

On the pitch Balotelli is a good player, one who has the potential to be great. This is because he has a bit of pace, power, a calm finisher and has a bit of skill. It is often overlooked that he is still a young player, having just turned 22 in August. In my opinion that is the only reason why Mancini entertains him at Manchester City. I think that by getting rid of a player like Mario Balotelli would be a mistake, as he is still young that he could realise his mistakes and change. As long as Mancini is there I think there is always a chance for the better Balotelli to come out. Manchester City have a big squad so therefore could carry him for a bit, possibly give him to the age of 24 to see if he does actually mature. If he does they have one heck of a striker on their hands. 

This probably will not happen, as rumours have resurfaced that Balotelli will leave in January. If he does leave now he could change his ways as I have earlier suggested or he could go totally off the rails. This would be a real shame, but I guess it has happened to many good players before him. Alex Ferguson stated after the red card against Arsenal that he would have sold Balotelli if he was his player. This is big for me, as he has tamed people like Cantona in the past. So if the two best man managers (Ferguson and Mourinho) don't want him then it does not look good for Balotelli does it. If Mancini does change him then he will have in my eyes done a great job.